How to ask your child's school what reading curriculum they use

A step-by-step guide to finding out what reading program your child's school uses, what questions to ask, and what your rights are if the answer worries you.

ReadFlare Team
23 min read
In This Article

Last updated 2026-07-11

Parent and teacher meeting at a classroom table to discuss a child's reading program
Parent and teacher meeting at a classroom table to discuss a child's reading program

TL;DR

Email your child's teacher or principal and ask, in writing, what reading curriculum the class uses. If nobody gives a clear answer, file a records request. Look for programs built on systematic phonics and structured literacy. If the curriculum is weak and your child is struggling, IDEA and Section 504 give you the right to push for better support.

Why does it matter which reading curriculum your school uses?

Most parents assume the school has this handled. That's a fair assumption. Teaching kids to read is the whole point of the early grades.

Here's the catch. Reading instruction in the United States has been, and in many districts still is, badly out of step with what the research shows. The National Reading Panel's 2000 report to Congress named five parts of effective reading instruction: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension [1]. A curriculum that skips or dilutes phonics, especially systematic and explicit phonics, leaves a lot of kids stranded. Kids with dyslexia and other language-based learning differences get hit hardest.

A 2019 EdWeek Research Center survey found that only about a third of elementary teachers felt confident their primary reading program was scientifically grounded, and roughly half reported mixing structured approaches with weaker ones [2]. Some states have improved since the "reading wars" hit the mainstream around 2023. Plenty haven't.

Knowing the curriculum gives you a baseline. If your child is struggling, you need to know whether the core approach is even likely to work for them. Otherwise you're guessing about a learning problem when the real issue might be a bad method.

What exactly should you ask, and who should you ask?

Start simple. Email the classroom teacher: "What reading curriculum does the class use this year? Is it the district-adopted core program, or do you add supplemental materials too?" One question, in writing, creates a record and usually gets you a real answer within a few days.

Want more detail? These follow-ups do the work:

  • What is the name and edition of the core reading program?
  • Is it the state-adopted or district-adopted curriculum?
  • Does the program use systematic, explicit phonics instruction?
  • Is there a scope and sequence I can review?
  • What supplemental programs does the school use for kids below grade level?
  • Has the program been reviewed or approved by any independent body?

If your child is already on an IEP or 504, add one more: does my child get instruction in a different program, or with different methods, than the general ed class? You have a right to that information as part of your child's education records under FERPA [3].

Vague answers happen. When they do, go to the literacy coach or curriculum coordinator at the building level. Any school large enough to staff a reading specialist has someone in that role. If they can't answer either, call the district's curriculum and instruction office. Answering this is their job.

What does a science-based reading curriculum actually look like?

The phrase "science of reading" gets tossed around constantly now. Knowing what it actually demands in a curriculum keeps you from getting spun.

A curriculum grounded in reading science has a clear, sequential phonics scope that teaches letter-sound correspondences in a planned order. It has phonemic awareness work in kindergarten and first grade. It has decodable texts that let early readers practice the exact patterns they've been taught. It ties vocabulary to word roots and morphology. Its fluency practice is structured, more than "read more."

Programs that hit these marks include UFLI Foundations (University of Florida Literacy Institute), Wilson Reading System, Barton Reading and Spelling, SPIRE, and Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA), among others [4]. That list isn't complete, and some of these are interventions rather than core programs, but they share the same bones.

Programs built on "balanced literacy," whole language, or the three-cueing system (where kids guess words from pictures or context instead of decoding them) don't line up with reading science. Emily Hanford's reporting at APM Reports laid out that gap in detail. The research she cites includes Castles, Rastle, and Nation's 2018 review in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, which stated: "there is overwhelming evidence that explicit phonics instruction is critical for all beginning readers" [5].

If the school names a program you don't recognize, look it up. The Florida Center for Reading Research keeps a free review database, and The Reading League runs a curriculum transparency guide. Both are public [4][6].

Share of U.S. elementary teachers who feel confident their primary reading program is scientifically grounded Responses from the 2019 EdWeek Research Center literacy survey of elementary teachers Feel confident program is science… 33% Use mixed or blended approaches 50% Uncertain or no dominant program 17% Source: EdWeek Research Center, Reading and Literacy Survey, 2019

How do you find out if your state or district has already evaluated the curriculum?

Many states now publish official curriculum review lists, and some go further by ordering districts to use only approved programs. Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas moved early on this and posted measurable reading score gains [7].

Here's how to find your state's position:

1. Search "[your state] department of education approved reading curriculum" or "[your state] reading curriculum review." 2. Check your state education department's website directly, under the literacy or curriculum section. 3. Pull up your district's school board meeting minutes, which are public. Districts usually have to bring curriculum adoption decisions to the board.

EdReports rates K-12 reading materials against research-based standards and posts the ratings for free. It's not perfect and it doesn't cover every program, but it's a solid cross-check [8].

If your state or district keeps an approved list, ask one more thing: is the school your child attends actually using a program from that list? "Approved" at the state level doesn't always mean "adopted" in the building, especially in states with no mandate.

What if the school says they can't or won't tell you?

They can, and they should. Curriculum is not confidential. It's a policy decision made with public money, and parents have every right to it.

Stonewalled anyway? Work these steps in order.

First, submit a written records request. Under FERPA, you have the right to inspect your child's education records within 45 days of a request [3]. Curriculum materials used in your child's instruction can fall under that. Put it in an email, name FERPA, and ask for the name and publisher of the reading program used in your child's classroom.

Second, file a public records request under your state's open records law (sometimes called a Freedom of Information Act request or its state equivalent). Curriculum adoption decisions, publisher contracts, and related board presentations are public records in nearly every state.

Third, contact your state education department's parent resource or ombudsman office. Every state has one. They can tell you what the district is required to use and whether it has reported compliance.

The ReadFlare parent advocacy kit has template letters for records requests and meeting prep, so you're not writing from a blank page.

Stay calm and stay in writing. A parent asking a fair question in good faith is very hard to brush off once there's a paper trail.

This is where the law turns into a tool you can actually use.

Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), children with disabilities, including dyslexia and other reading-based learning disabilities, have the right to a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment [9]. If your child qualifies for an IEP, the team has to pick methods and materials built to meet that child's specific needs, more than whatever the class happens to use. A child with dyslexia whose IEP calls for structured literacy is entitled to it even if the rest of the class uses something else.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act requires schools to provide reasonable accommodations for students with disabilities that affect a major life activity, and reading is explicitly a major life activity [10]. A 504 plan can specify reading instructional methods, not only classroom accommodations like extra time. If you haven't sorted out which path fits, the difference between an IEP vs 504 matters a lot here.

The Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights has said that a school's failure to provide evidence-based reading instruction to a child with dyslexia can amount to disability discrimination under Section 504 and the ADA. The guidance lives in OCR's Dear Colleague letters, posted on ED.gov [10].

None of this lets you demand a specific brand. Schools keep discretion over methods. But you can insist that whatever methods they use be evidence-based and fit your child's identified needs, and you can document the failure if it drags on.

Has your child shown signs of dyslexia but never been evaluated? Asking about the curriculum is often the first move that leads to requesting a dyslexia test or a full special education evaluation.

How do you bring this up at a school meeting without creating conflict?

Most teachers don't get defensive about curriculum questions if you frame them right. Lead with curiosity, not accusation. "I've been reading about different reading programs and I want to understand what my child is learning" lands very differently from "I heard your program isn't evidence-based."

A few things that help.

Schedule a real meeting, not a rushed hallway chat. Ask for 20 minutes and come with your questions written down. That signals you're serious and organized, which tends to pull more complete answers.

If you've already found weak EdReports ratings or a program that isn't on your state's approved list, hold that until after you've heard the teacher out. You might learn something that changes the picture.

If an answer worries you, say: "I'd like time to read more about this. Can I follow up with a few questions by email?" That buys you research time and keeps the door open.

For any child already on a 504 plan or IEP, the annual review is the right place to raise curriculum concerns formally. Bring documentation. Bring the program name. Ask whether the team thinks the current program fits your child's specific profile.

If the reading approach is failing your child and you're also worried about learning disabilities more broadly, raise both in one meeting, not two.

What if your child's school uses a phonics-based program but your child is still struggling?

A good core curriculum isn't a guarantee. Three things can still go wrong even when the program itself is solid.

Implementation fidelity is the first. A well-built phonics program taught by someone who never got trained in it, or who mixes in conflicting methods, often falls flat. Ask how teachers were trained on the program and how fidelity gets monitored.

Intensity is the second. Some kids need more than a general education classroom can give. A child with dyslexia may need one-on-one or very small-group structured literacy work, like Wilson Reading or Barton, on top of the core curriculum. A strong core program doesn't cancel the need for intervention.

The third: phonics alone doesn't fix everything. Once decoding is solid, some kids still stall on comprehension, fluency, or vocabulary. If your child reads words accurately but doesn't grasp what they read, the problem sits past the phonics stage. How to improve reading comprehension is a different conversation with the school than the decoding one.

If nothing is clicking, it may be time to ask for a formal evaluation. Under IDEA, the school has to evaluate any child suspected of a disability that affects their education, at no cost to you, once you request it in writing [9].

What is Response to Intervention (RTI) and how does it connect to curriculum?

RTI (Response to Intervention), also called MTSS (Multi-Tiered System of Supports), is the framework most schools use to catch struggling readers early. It runs in tiers. Every student gets Tier 1 core instruction. Kids who fall behind get more intensive Tier 2 small-group work. Kids who still don't respond move to Tier 3, the most intensive level and often the door to a special education evaluation.

Knowing the curriculum means knowing what happens at each tier, more than Tier 1. Ask which Tier 2 intervention program the school uses and how a child gets selected for it. Ask what Tier 3 looks like.

Here's a trap parents fall into. Schools sometimes use RTI to stall a formal evaluation. "Let's see how they respond to intervention first" can be legitimate. But under IDEA, a school cannot use the RTI process to deny or delay a timely evaluation for special education eligibility [9]. If your child has spent a full school year in intervention with barely any progress, that data should be feeding an evaluation request, not standing in for one.

The curriculum used at each tier feeds directly into your IEP or 504 plan school discussions, so document what programs your child gets at every level.

How can you check whether specific reading programs have research behind them?

A handful of public databases are worth knowing by name.

The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), run by the Institute of Education Sciences at the U.S. Department of Education, reviews reading intervention and curriculum programs against a defined evidence standard and posts free reports on each [11]. Not every program has been reviewed, and the WWC bar is high enough that many programs simply haven't been studied in ways that clear it. That doesn't automatically make them bad. But a program with strong WWC evidence is on far firmer ground than one with none.

The Florida Center for Reading Research (FCRR) at Florida State University publishes reviews of early literacy and intervention programs, sorted by grade and instructional focus. Free and plain-spoken [4].

EdReports rates K-12 curriculum materials and posts its full rubrics [8].

The Reading League publishes a curriculum transparency guide built specifically around structured literacy criteria [6].

If you're checking a program the school uses for a child with dyslexia, Decoding Dyslexia's state chapters sometimes post state-specific lists of what districts are using and how it's going.

One honest caveat: nobody has clean comparative data across every reading program. Most haven't been through randomized controlled trials at scale. The WWC data is the best available, and the gaps are still wide. Look for convergent evidence: solid WWC ratings, an FCRR review, and alignment with the five components from the National Reading Panel [1].

What should you do if you discover the school uses a program with poor evidence?

Get it in writing first. Confirm by email which program the school uses and at which grade levels. You want a record.

Check your state education department's website next, to see whether your state keeps a required or recommended curriculum list and whether this program is on it.

Then bring it to the school. Schedule a meeting with the principal or literacy coordinator and ask directly: "I looked up [program name] on the What Works Clearinghouse and it doesn't have strong evidence ratings. Can you tell me why the school chose it, and what the plan is for students who aren't making progress?" That's a reasonable question, not a hostile one.

If your child is already struggling, don't wait for the district to swap curricula. That can take years. Put your energy on what your individual child can get right now: supplemental intervention, an IEP, a 504, or outside tutoring using structured literacy.

Connect with other parents too. Most state reading advocacy groups and the national Decoding Dyslexia organization can tell you whether other families in your district have raised the same flags, and whether an organized push is already going.

The ReadFlare parent advocacy kit includes a curriculum research checklist and a guide to writing formal requests, which gives you a structured place to start.

Sight words instruction is one spot where programs often drift from the research in ways parents notice but can't always name. Understanding sight words and how they fit into decoding sharpens the questions you bring to the school.

Frequently asked questions

Can I legally ask the school what reading curriculum they use?

Yes, without question. Curriculum information is not confidential. It's chosen with public funds and covered by public records laws in every state. FERPA also gives you access to education records tied to your child's instruction. If a school refuses to say what reading program it uses, submit a written public records request to the district office. No legal barrier stands between you and this information.

What if the teacher says they don't use a specific curriculum?

Some teachers, especially veterans, blend materials from several sources instead of following one adopted program. That's worth knowing. Ask: what phonics sequence do you follow? What decodable readers do students use? What does a typical reading lesson look like? Those questions reveal the real approach even without a single named program. If the answers point to no systematic phonics structure, that's a genuine concern to raise with the principal.

How do I find out if my state has an approved reading curriculum list?

Search your state department of education's website for terms like "approved reading programs" or "literacy curriculum review." Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas have published official lists with their approval criteria. Many other states followed after reading science drew renewed attention around 2022 to 2023. If you can't find it online, call the state DOE's literacy or curriculum office directly. They're required to answer.

What is structured literacy and why do parents keep mentioning it?

Structured literacy is an umbrella term for reading instruction that is systematic, explicit, and sequential, covering phonemic awareness, phonics, morphology, syntax, and comprehension. It has the strongest research base for students with dyslexia and other language-based learning differences. The International Dyslexia Association defines and endorses it. Wilson Reading System and Barton are structured literacy programs. It's different from whole language or balanced literacy.

What should I do if my child's IEP mentions reading goals but I don't know what program the school uses to meet them?

Ask at the next IEP meeting, or send an email before then. The IEP must specify the special education services your child receives, and those services should name the instructional approach or program used for reading intervention. If the IEP is vague here, request an amendment or a meeting to clarify. Under IDEA, services must be reasonably calculated to produce progress, and you're entitled to know how.

Can I request that the school use a specific reading program for my child?

You can request it, but the school keeps legal discretion over instructional methods even for IEP students. What you can do is request that the program used be evidence-based and appropriate for your child's specific disability profile. If the school refuses a structured literacy approach for a child with diagnosed dyslexia despite documented lack of progress, that refusal is worth documenting and possibly escalating to your state's special education office or OCR.

What does the research say about which reading programs work best?

The What Works Clearinghouse at the Institute of Education Sciences reviews reading programs against rigorous evidence standards and posts free reports. Programs with strong systematic phonics components, like UFLI Foundations and SPIRE, tend to perform well in controlled studies. The National Reading Panel's 2000 report set the five-component framework most research-backed programs still use. No single program has perfect evidence, but convergence across WWC, FCRR, and EdReports gives you a fair picture.

My child is in kindergarten and seems behind. Should I ask about curriculum now or wait?

Ask now. Kindergarten is exactly when the curriculum matters most. Early phonemic awareness and phonics instruction in kindergarten and first grade are among the strongest predictors of later reading success, per the National Reading Panel. Waiting to see how things develop can cost a child a year or more of foundational instruction. Find out whether the kindergarten program teaches letter-sound correspondences explicitly and in sequence, and whether kids practice with decodable texts.

How is a reading curriculum different from a reading intervention program?

The core reading curriculum is what every child in the class gets, sometimes called Tier 1 instruction. A reading intervention program is extra, targeted support for kids falling behind, sometimes called Tier 2 or Tier 3 under RTI or MTSS. Your child may get both, and they may run on different programs. Ask about both separately. A strong core curriculum shrinks how many kids need intervention, but it doesn't erase the need for it.

What is the three-cueing system and why is it controversial?

The three-cueing system teaches children to figure out unknown words using three cues: meaning (what makes sense), syntax (what sounds right), and visual (what the word looks like). Critics, backed by a substantial body of reading science including work by cognitive scientists Keith Stanovich and Linnea Ehri, argue it encourages guessing instead of decoding. The core problem is that it undercuts phonics by handing children an alternative to sounding words out.

Can the school charge me for information about the reading curriculum?

Generally no, not for simply answering the question. If you file a formal public records request for documents like curriculum adoption agreements or teacher training materials, some states let agencies charge a modest fee for copying or staff time beyond a threshold, but it's usually small and sometimes waived for parents. The name and publisher of the reading program your child is taught should be free, with no formal request or fee.

What if I disagree with the school's curriculum choice but my child doesn't have an IEP?

Your options are narrower without an IEP or 504, but you still have pull. Raise concerns with the principal and, if needed, the school board. Connect with other parents who share the worry. Many state-level curriculum changes started with parent pressure at board meetings. You can also supplement at home with structured literacy tutoring or programs. If your child's struggles are serious enough, pursuing a formal evaluation for a possible learning disability gives you a legal foothold.

What questions should I bring to a school meeting about reading curriculum?

Bring these: What is the name and edition of the core reading program? Does it use systematic, explicit phonics? Is it on the state-approved list? What Tier 2 intervention program is used for struggling readers? How were teachers trained on this program? How is my child's progress monitored, and how often? If my child isn't making adequate progress after a full year, what happens next? Write them down and take notes so you have a record.

Sources

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Report of the National Reading Panel (2000): The National Reading Panel identified five components of effective reading instruction: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension.
  2. EdWeek Research Center, Reading and Literacy Survey 2019: Roughly half of elementary teachers reported using materials that mix structured literacy with less evidence-based approaches; about a third felt confident their primary program was scientifically grounded.
  3. U.S. Department of Education, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA): Under FERPA, parents have the right to inspect and review their child's education records within 45 days of a request.
  4. Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, Program Reviews: FCRR publishes free reviews of early literacy and intervention programs organized by grade and instructional focus.
  5. Castles, Rastle, and Nation, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2018: The 2018 review concluded that 'there is overwhelming evidence that explicit phonics instruction is critical for all beginning readers.'
  6. The Reading League, Curriculum Transparency Guide: The Reading League publishes a curriculum transparency guide organized around structured literacy criteria for evaluating reading programs.
  7. National Conference of State Legislatures, Reading Policy Overview, 2023: Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas adopted evidence-based reading curriculum requirements early and showed measurable reading score improvements.
  8. EdReports, Curriculum Reviews: EdReports rates K-12 reading materials against research-based standards and publishes those ratings publicly.
  9. U.S. Department of Education, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Under IDEA, children with disabilities have the right to a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE), and schools cannot use the RTI process to deny or delay a timely special education evaluation.
  10. U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, Section 504 and ADA Guidance: OCR has stated that failure to provide evidence-based reading instruction to a child with dyslexia can constitute disability discrimination under Section 504 and the ADA; reading is a major life activity.
  11. What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education: The What Works Clearinghouse reviews reading intervention and curriculum programs against a defined evidence standard and publishes free reports on each.

Disclaimer: ReadFlare is an educational technology tool, not a diagnostic instrument. It does not diagnose dyslexia or any learning disability. Consult qualified specialists for formal diagnosis.

ReadFlare Team

ReadFlare provides expert guidance and tools to help you succeed. Our content is reviewed for accuracy and kept up to date.

Related Articles

Related Glossary Terms

ReadFlare
Build the Reading Plan