IEP writer: how to write a strong IEP (and check what school wrote)

Learn what makes an IEP legally sound, how to write or review one yourself, and what Pennsylvania parents need to know. Covers IDEA requirements and reading goals.

ReadFlare Team
26 min read
In This Article

Last updated 2026-07-09

Parent and child reviewing IEP paperwork together at a kitchen table in morning light
Parent and child reviewing IEP paperwork together at a kitchen table in morning light

TL;DR

An IEP writer is anyone, parent or school team, who drafts an Individualized Education Program under IDEA. A legally sound IEP must include present levels of performance, measurable annual goals, services, and progress reporting. Parents have the right to propose goals, request changes, and refuse consent. This guide walks through every required component and shows you how to write or strengthen any IEP.

What is an IEP writer, exactly?

The term "IEP writer" gets used two ways. First, it describes whoever at the school actually types up the document, often a special education teacher or case manager. Second, it describes parents and advocates who draft their own proposed IEP language before a meeting. Both uses are legitimate, and understanding both gives you more power in the room.

Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the IEP is not the school's document. It belongs to the child. Every member of the IEP team, which must include at least one of the child's parents, a general education teacher, a special education teacher, and a district representative, has the right to contribute language. [1] Nothing in IDEA says parents have to accept whatever the school brings to the table.

Starting from scratch as a parent? Writing your first IEP as a new special educator? The structure is identical either way. IDEA Section 614(d) lays out eight required components. Get those right, and everything else follows.

For background on what an IEP actually is and how eligibility works, start there before tackling the writing itself.

What are the required components every IEP must include?

IDEA Section 614(d)(1)(A) lists the mandatory elements. [1] Miss any of them and the IEP is legally deficient, which can open the door to a due process complaint or a state complaint.

Here are the eight required components:

1. Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) This is the foundation. It describes what the child can and cannot do right now, in plain language, with data. Weak PLAAFPs say things like "Johnny has difficulty with reading." A strong PLAAFP says "On the DIBELS 8 Oral Reading Fluency assessment in March 2025, Johnny read 42 words per minute at grade 3 benchmark, which is below the 70 wpm end-of-year target. He scores at the 8th percentile on the Woodcock-Johnson IV Basic Reading cluster."

2. Measurable annual goals Goals must be measurable. "Johnny will improve his reading" is not a goal. "Given a grade-3 passage, Johnny will read at least 70 words per minute with 95% accuracy as measured by DIBELS ORF in four of five consecutive probes by June 2026" is a goal.

3. Description of how progress will be measured and when reports will be given Parents must receive progress reports at least as often as report cards go out to general education students. [1]

4. Statement of special education and related services How many minutes per week, in what setting, starting when, with what type of provider.

5. Explanation of the extent to which the child will not participate in general education The default is inclusion. Any removal from general education must be justified.

6. Accommodations for state and district testing Or a statement explaining why the child will take an alternate assessment.

7. Projected dates for services to begin and their duration Services must start within a reasonable time after the IEP is finalized, typically no more than a few days.

8. Transition planning Beginning at age 16 (age 14 in some states, including Pennsylvania [2]), the IEP must include transition goals and services tied to post-secondary education, employment, and independent living.

For a side-by-side of IEP and 504 plan requirements, the difference between IEP and 504 is covered in detail elsewhere on this site.

How do you write a PLAAFP that actually drives good goals?

The PLAAFP section is where most IEPs fall apart. School teams sometimes write vague summaries of evaluation scores without connecting them to what the child actually needs in a classroom. That disconnection makes goals weak and services undersized.

A good PLAAFP answers four questions in sequence:

1. What does the data show? (Name the assessment, the score, the date, the norm.) 2. How does this affect access to the general curriculum? (Specific class, specific task.) 3. What does the child do well? (Genuine strengths, not filler.) 4. What does the child need to make progress? (This becomes the seed of the goal.)

For a struggling reader with dyslexia, the PLAAFP might pull from a psychoeducational evaluation showing a processing speed score at the 12th percentile, a phonological awareness composite below the 10th percentile, and a word reading score two grade levels below placement. It should name the specific assessments, more than say "testing was completed." [3]

Here's a sentence structure that works: "According to the [assessment name] administered on [date], [child's name] scored [score], which is [percentile/grade equivalent], compared to a typical peer expectation of [benchmark]. This affects [specific academic task] because [explanation]." Once you have that, the annual goal nearly writes itself.

Parents: if the school's PLAAFP doesn't cite specific data, that's your first agenda item at the IEP meeting. Ask which assessments are reflected and request that scores appear in the document.

IEP required components under IDEA Section 614(d) Eight legally required elements every IEP must contain Present Levels of Performance (PL… 1 Measurable Annual Goals 1 Progress Measurement and Reporting 1 Special Education and Related Ser… 1 General Education Participation S… 1 Testing Accommodations 1 Service Start Dates and Duration 1 Transition Planning (age 16, or 1… 1 Source: U.S. Department of Education, IDEA Section 614(d)(1)(A), sites.ed.gov/idea

How do you write measurable IEP goals for reading?

Every measurable goal needs four parts: a condition, the student's name, the behavior, and the criterion. [4] Special educators often call this the "ABCD" format (Antecedent, Behavior, Condition, Degree), though the naming varies by district.

For reading, goals generally fall into these categories:

Skill areaExample measurable goal
Phonological awarenessGiven a list of 20 spoken words, [student] will identify the initial phoneme with 90% accuracy in 3 of 4 sessions by [date].
Phonics / decodingGiven grade-level decodable text, [student] will correctly decode words with closed-syllable patterns at 95% accuracy across 4 consecutive probes by [date].
Oral reading fluencyGiven a grade-2 passage, [student] will read 70 WPM with fewer than 3 errors in 4 of 5 consecutive DIBELS ORF probes by [date].
Reading comprehensionAfter reading a 300-word informational passage independently, [student] will answer 4 of 5 literal comprehension questions correctly in 4 of 5 sessions by [date].
VocabularyGiven 10 tier-2 vocabulary words pre-taught in class, [student] will provide a definition and use each word correctly in a sentence with 80% accuracy by [date].

Benchmark data from DIBELS 8 provides grade-level norms that make fluency goals concrete and defensible. [5] For phonics goals, the research base is clear: systematic, explicit phonics instruction produces significantly better outcomes than embedded or incidental approaches. A 2000 report from the National Reading Panel found that systematic phonics instruction benefited children significantly more on reading and spelling outcomes than programs that taught little or no phonics. [6]

Avoid goals that say "will improve" without specifying from what to what. Avoid goals measured by "teacher observation" alone. Observation can supplement, but a curriculum-based measurement or standardized probe should be the primary measure.

What services belong in an IEP for a child with dyslexia or reading disabilities?

Services in an IEP must be based on peer-reviewed research to the extent practicable. That's the statutory language from IDEA Section 614(d)(1)(A)(i)(IV). [1] For reading disabilities, that phrase does real work.

The research is unambiguous: structured literacy approaches, which include systematic phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension instruction, produce better outcomes for students with dyslexia than balanced literacy or whole-language approaches. [6][7] When advocating for services, you can point to that evidence and ask whether the proposed program meets the "peer-reviewed research" standard in IDEA.

For a child with a reading disability, an IEP might include:

  • Direct reading instruction using a structured literacy curriculum (Orton-Gillingham based, SPIRE, Wilson Reading System, Barton, RAVE-O, etc.), typically 45 to 90 minutes per day for more severe profiles.
  • Speech-language services if phonological processing deficits are present.
  • Occupational therapy if written expression or fine motor challenges coexist.
  • Accommodations: extended time, text-to-speech, reduced written output demands, oral testing.
  • Assistive technology: speech-to-text tools, audiobooks, screen readers.

Minutes matter. An IEP that says "reading support 30 minutes per week" for a child who is three grade levels behind is not meaningfully designed. Research on intensive intervention suggests students who are significantly behind need a minimum of 90 minutes of daily reading instruction, with 30 or more of those minutes in targeted small-group or one-on-one work. [7]

If you want technology tools to support practice at home alongside IEP services, the ReadFlare reading toolkit includes fluency and phonics activities built on the same structured literacy principles the evidence supports.

What rights do parents have as part of the IEP writing process?

Parents are not guests at the IEP table. IDEA makes that explicit. Under 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(1)(B), parents are required members of the IEP team. [1] That membership comes with specific rights that many parents don't know they have.

You have the right to:

  • Receive written prior notice before any change in placement, services, or identification. The school must explain what they're proposing, why, and what alternatives they considered. [8]
  • Provide or withhold consent. For initial evaluations and initial placement, you must consent in writing. You can also revoke consent for special education services at any time, though that ends the school's obligation to provide an IEP.
  • Request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense if you disagree with the school's evaluation. The district must either fund the IEE or file for due process to defend their evaluation. [8]
  • Inspect all educational records related to your child within 45 days of request under FERPA, or within 45 days under IDEA (though states may set shorter timelines). [1]
  • Propose IEP goals and services yourself. You can bring a written draft to any IEP meeting. The team must consider it.
  • Bring an advocate or attorney to any IEP meeting.
  • Dispute the IEP through mediation, a state complaint, or a due process hearing.

Parents in Pennsylvania have additional state-level rights under Chapter 14 of Pennsylvania's special education regulations. [2] The Pennsylvania Department of Education's Bureau of Special Education outlines timelines and procedures that go beyond the IDEA floor in some areas, including the transition planning age of 14 rather than IDEA's 16.

For a broader look at how the IEP process works in school settings, that resource covers the eligibility and meeting process from start to finish.

What is an IEP writer in Pennsylvania, and are there specific state rules?

Pennsylvania IEP writers, whether parents or school staff, work under both IDEA and the state's Chapter 14 regulations. [2] Pennsylvania follows the federal IDEA structure but adds several specifics.

Key Pennsylvania-specific rules:

  • Transition planning begins at age 14, two years earlier than the federal IDEA floor of 16. [2]
  • Reevaluations must occur at least every three years, consistent with IDEA, and the district must give notice and get consent for reevaluations.
  • Compensatory education is a remedy available in Pennsylvania when a student was denied a free appropriate public education (FAPE). If IEP services weren't delivered as written, Pennsylvania hearing officers have ordered make-up services.
  • The Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network (PaTTAN) provides IEP writing resources, model IEPs, and training for educators and parents. Their materials are publicly available at pattan.net.
  • Notice timelines: Pennsylvania requires schools to provide parents with an advance copy of the IEP at least ten calendar days before the scheduled IEP meeting, under certain circumstances. Check Chapter 14, Section 14.153 for the specifics. [2]

If you're a Pennsylvania parent writing your own proposed IEP language, the PaTTAN website has IEP templates and goal banks that align with Pennsylvania Academic Standards. The state complaint process runs through the PDE Bureau of Special Education, which must investigate and resolve complaints within 60 calendar days. [2]

Tools like Frontline IEP and Embrace IEP are the two most common IEP management platforms used by Pennsylvania districts. They're software, not IEP writers, but knowing the platform your district uses helps you request records in the right format.

What software do schools use to write IEPs, and can parents access it?

Most school districts use dedicated IEP software rather than word processors. The dominant platforms in the U.S. are Frontline Special Education Management (formerly Frontline IEP) and Embrace IEP, along with SEIS (Special Education Information System) in California and several state-run platforms.

Parents typically don't get a login to the school's IEP software. That's a policy choice by districts, not a legal requirement. Some districts use IEP Online or similar platforms that do offer parent portals. A few states, like Maryland, have state-level IEP platforms with broader parent access options.

What you are legally entitled to is a copy of the finalized IEP. Under IDEA and FERPA, you can request all educational records, which includes the IEP and any prior versions. [8] The school must provide this within 45 days (IDEA) and, under FERPA, before any meeting where you'll discuss them.

Want to write or propose IEP language without the school's software? A plain Word document or PDF works fine. Bring it to the meeting as a parent proposal. The team is obligated to consider it. They're not obligated to adopt it word-for-word, but any refusal must come with a written prior notice explaining why.

If your district uses IEP Stock style goal banks, ask for the goal library they're pulling from. Some districts rely heavily on pre-written goal templates that may not match your child's specific data.

What makes an IEP legally enforceable, and what does FAPE actually require?

FAPE stands for Free Appropriate Public Education. It's the legal standard every IEP must meet. The Supreme Court clarified the standard in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017), holding that an IEP must be "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances." [9] That's a higher bar than the older "some educational benefit" language from earlier case law.

Endrew F. matters for IEP writing because it means a child with significant potential shouldn't be stuck with minimal goals. If the data shows a child could close the gap with intensive intervention, an IEP designed only to prevent regression probably doesn't meet the Endrew F. standard.

For an IEP to be enforceable:

  • Goals must be measurable (so progress or lack of it can be documented).
  • Services must be stated with enough specificity that a provider knows what to deliver.
  • The IEP must actually be implemented. An IEP that exists on paper but isn't delivered is a FAPE denial.
  • Progress must be tracked and reported to parents.

If progress reports show "insufficient progress" quarter after quarter and the team doesn't adjust the IEP, that's a problem. IDEA doesn't require that a child always meet the goal, but it does require that the team respond to data showing the current approach isn't working.

Documentation is your best friend. Keep every email, every progress report, every meeting notice, and every version of the IEP. If you ever file a state complaint or request a due process hearing, the paper trail is the case.

How do you write IEP goals for reading comprehension and vocabulary?

Reading comprehension goals are harder to write well than fluency goals because comprehension is less directly observable. The temptation is to write goals like "will demonstrate improved reading comprehension," which is unmeasurable and therefore unenforceable.

For comprehension, tie the goal to a specific task, a specific text level or Lexile range, and a specific accuracy threshold:

  • "Given a 400-word informational text at a 600L Lexile level, [student] will independently answer 4 of 5 literal and inferential comprehension questions with 80% accuracy across 4 of 5 weekly probes by [date]."
  • "After reading a grade-appropriate narrative passage, [student] will verbally summarize the main idea and three supporting details with 80% accuracy in 4 of 5 opportunities by [date]."

Vocabulary goals should specify which word types (tier-2 academic vocabulary is usually the priority [10]), how many words, and the expected demonstration of mastery. Giving a definition is a lower bar than using the word in context; the latter is a better measure of real learning.

For students with dyslexia who have strong listening comprehension but weak decoding, comprehension goals might be set for listening comprehension first, then shifted to independent reading comprehension as decoding catches up. Distinguishing those two pathways in the PLAAFP prevents the team from conflating decoding deficits with comprehension deficits. The Simple View of Reading, which frames reading comprehension as the product of decoding and language comprehension, is the research model most useful for this distinction. [11]

For deeper coverage of what drives reading comprehension difficulties, the reading comprehension section of this site has assessment-focused guidance for parents.

When should a parent write their own IEP proposal, and how?

Write your own IEP proposal whenever you walk into a meeting knowing the school's draft won't address your child's needs. That's more common than it should be. Schools don't always have time, resources, or institutional will to push for the level of service a child needs.

Writing a parent proposal doesn't mean you're adversarial. It means you're prepared. Here's how to do it:

1. Get the most recent evaluation data. If there's no recent evaluation, request one before the IEP meeting. 2. Write a PLAAFP paragraph using the format described earlier: assessment name, score, date, norm, impact on classroom access. 3. Write one or two goals per area of need in ABCD format. 4. List the services you believe are necessary and the research basis for them (for reading: structured literacy, X minutes per day, evidence from NRP [6] or IDA position papers [7]). 5. List accommodations that address documented barriers. 6. Date and sign your proposal, and present it as a parent proposal at the meeting.

The school must document that they considered your proposal. If they reject elements, they must issue prior written notice explaining why. That notice is a record you can use in a state complaint or due process hearing.

The ReadFlare parent advocacy kit includes editable IEP goal templates, a PLAAFP writing guide, and a meeting preparation checklist designed for parents facing exactly this situation.

Still unsure whether your child needs an IEP versus a 504 plan? The IEP vs 504 comparison explains when each applies and what protections each provides.

What are common IEP writing mistakes and how do you catch them?

Both school teams and parents make the same mistakes repeatedly. Knowing them in advance saves you significant frustration.

Vague PLAAFP statements. "Struggles with reading" isn't a present level. Demand scores. If the IEP doesn't cite a specific assessment and score, it's not data-driven.

Non-measurable goals. Any goal with "will improve," "will demonstrate understanding," or "will increase awareness" without a number attached is not measurable. Push for specific percentages, frequencies, and timeframes.

Goals not tied to the PLAAFP. Each goal should trace directly back to a gap identified in the present levels. If the PLAAFP identifies a fluency deficit and there's no fluency goal, ask why.

Services described too vaguely. "Reading support as needed" is not a service. The IEP must state frequency (how many times per week), duration (how many minutes each session), location (resource room, general ed, co-taught), and the type of provider.

Progress measured by grades or teacher observation alone. A grade can reflect effort, attendance, or behavior as much as reading skill. Progress on IEP goals should be measured by curriculum-based measurement, standardized probes, or structured task performance with defined criteria.

Transition goals that don't connect to post-secondary outcomes. For students 16 and older (14 in Pennsylvania [2]), the IEP must include age-appropriate transition assessments and goals tied to measurable post-secondary outcomes in education/training, employment, and where appropriate, independent living. A goal that says "will explore career options" isn't measurable.

Missing accommodations for testing. If a child qualifies for extended time or text-to-speech on state assessments, that must be in the IEP. It doesn't carry over automatically from accommodations used in class.

One practical move: after every IEP meeting, read the final document within a few days and send a written note to the case manager flagging anything that doesn't match what was agreed in the meeting. Do it by email so there's a record.

Frequently asked questions

Can a parent write their own IEP goals and bring them to the meeting?

Yes. Parents are full IEP team members under IDEA Section 614(d)(1)(B) and can bring written proposed goals to any meeting. The team must consider your proposals. If they reject any part, the school must issue prior written notice explaining the reasoning. Bringing a written proposal is one of the most effective advocacy moves a parent can make.

What does an IEP writer do differently from a special education teacher?

A special education teacher delivers instruction; the IEP writer role is specifically about drafting the document. In most schools these overlap: the special ed teacher writes the IEP. But parents, advocates, and even attorneys can write proposed IEP language. The skill is translating evaluation data into measurable goals and legally specified services, which is distinct from instructional delivery.

How long does writing an IEP take?

For a school team, drafting a complete IEP typically takes two to four hours for a straightforward case. Complex cases with multiple service areas, transition components, or significant disagreement can take much longer. Parents should budget at least two to three hours reviewing a draft before a meeting if they want to come in prepared.

Is there a free IEP writer tool parents can use?

There's no universally recommended free IEP writing tool for parents. PaTTAN (Pennsylvania's training network) offers free goal banks and IEP templates at pattan.net. The National Center for Learning Disabilities and Understood.org have goal-writing guides. Be cautious with AI-generated IEP goals: they can produce grammatically clean but educationally vague language that won't hold up under scrutiny.

What is an IEP writer in Pennsylvania specifically?

In Pennsylvania, IEP writers follow both IDEA and the state's Chapter 14 regulations. Key Pennsylvania differences include transition planning starting at age 14 (vs. 16 federally), specific parent notice requirements before IEP meetings, and access to PaTTAN resources for goal writing. The state complaint process is handled by the PDE Bureau of Special Education and must be resolved within 60 days.

What's the difference between an IEP goal and an IEP objective?

IDEA no longer requires short-term objectives for most students; they were removed in the 2004 reauthorization except for students taking alternate assessments. Some states and districts still include them voluntarily. An objective is a sub-step toward an annual goal (e.g., a goal targets 70 wpm by June; an objective targets 55 wpm by January). If a district includes them, they should be measurable too.

How do I know if my child's IEP goals are strong enough?

Ask these questions: Does each goal include a specific condition, behavior, criterion, and timeframe? Is each goal tied directly to a gap named in the PLAAFP? Is the measurement method a real assessment or probe rather than teacher observation alone? Is the target ambitious enough given the Endrew F. standard, which requires progress appropriate to the child's circumstances? If the answer to any of these is no, the goal needs revision.

Can a school write an IEP without a parent present?

A school can hold an IEP meeting without a parent only if they made repeated documented attempts to schedule a mutually agreeable time and the parent couldn't attend. They must document those attempts. If you weren't properly notified or couldn't participate meaningfully, you can challenge the IEP. Under IDEA, parental participation is a procedural safeguard, not optional.

What is the Endrew F. standard and why does it matter for IEP writing?

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017) is a Supreme Court decision that raised the FAPE standard. The Court held that an IEP must be reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances, not merely provide de minimis benefit. This means IEP goals should be genuinely ambitious, not set at the floor of what the school is comfortable delivering.

How do I request an independent IEP review or IEE if I disagree with the school's evaluation?

Under IDEA Section 615(b)(1), you can request an Independent Educational Evaluation at public expense in writing. The school must either pay for the IEE from a qualified evaluator you choose (within their geographic and cost guidelines) or file for due process to defend their evaluation. They cannot simply refuse. Request it in writing and keep a copy with a dated record of the school's response.

What reading programs are evidence-based enough to request in an IEP?

Programs with the strongest evidence for students with dyslexia and reading disabilities include Orton-Gillingham based curricula (Wilson Reading System, Barton Reading and Spelling, SPIRE, Fundations), RAVE-O, and other structured literacy programs reviewed by the What Works Clearinghouse at ies.ed.gov. The International Dyslexia Association's Knowledge and Practice Standards are a useful reference when advocating for a specific program.

How often should an IEP be revised?

Formally, an IEP must be reviewed at least annually. But IDEA also allows any team member, including parents, to request a meeting to review and revise the IEP at any time. If progress reports show a child isn't making progress toward goals, request a meeting in writing rather than waiting for the annual date. Waiting a full year when data shows failure isn't required.

What's the difference between an IEP and a 504 plan for a struggling reader?

An IEP is created under IDEA and provides special education services. A 504 plan is under the Rehabilitation Act and provides accommodations but not specialized instruction. A struggling reader who needs a structured literacy program needs an IEP; a student who just needs extended time and audiobooks may be served by a 504. See the full comparison in the IEP vs 504 article on this site.

Can I record an IEP meeting?

Recording rules vary by state. Some states allow it with notice, some require mutual consent, and a few restrict it more tightly. Pennsylvania requires that you notify the school district in advance if you plan to record. Check your state's rules before the meeting. Even if you can't record, you can take detailed written notes, bring a second adult to do so, or bring an advocate.

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Education, IDEA Section 614(d), Individuals with Disabilities Education Act text: IEP required components under IDEA Section 614(d)(1)(A) and parent team membership under Section 614(d)(1)(B)
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Education, Chapter 14 Special Education Regulations: Pennsylvania transition planning begins at age 14 and state-specific IEP procedures under Chapter 14
  3. International Dyslexia Association, Knowledge and Practice Standards for Teachers of Reading: Assessment data requirements for identifying dyslexia and reading disabilities in IEP evaluation
  4. IRIS Center, Vanderbilt University, Writing Measurable IEP Goals and Objectives: ABCD format (condition, behavior, criterion, degree) for writing measurable IEP goals
  5. University of Oregon, DIBELS 8th Edition Benchmark Goals and Composite Score: DIBELS 8 oral reading fluency grade-level benchmarks used to set measurable IEP goals
  6. National Reading Panel, Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment (NICHD, 2000): Systematic phonics instruction produces significantly better reading and spelling outcomes than programs with little or no phonics
  7. International Dyslexia Association, Dyslexia in the Classroom: What Every Teacher Needs to Know: Students significantly behind in reading need a minimum of 90 minutes of daily reading instruction with targeted small-group or one-on-one components
  8. U.S. Department of Education, IDEA Procedural Safeguards Notice, ED.gov: Parent rights to prior written notice, consent, Independent Educational Evaluation at public expense, and educational records under IDEA Section 615
  9. U.S. Supreme Court, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. 386 (2017): IEP must be reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances
  10. Beck, McKeown & Kucan, Bringing Words to Life (Guilford Press); tier-2 vocabulary research base: Tier-2 academic vocabulary is the priority area for vocabulary instruction in school-age students
  11. Gough & Tunmer (1986), Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability, Remedial and Special Education: Simple View of Reading: reading comprehension equals decoding multiplied by language comprehension
  12. What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education: Evidence ratings for structured literacy and reading intervention programs referenced in IEP service recommendations

Disclaimer: ReadFlare is an educational technology tool, not a diagnostic instrument. It does not diagnose dyslexia or any learning disability. Consult qualified specialists for formal diagnosis.

ReadFlare Team

ReadFlare provides expert guidance and tools to help you succeed. Our content is reviewed for accuracy and kept up to date.

Related Articles

ReadFlare
Build the Reading Plan